• Home
  • About
    • About
    • Policies
  • Submissions
    • Op-eds
    • News / Announcements
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

eJewish Philanthropy

Your Jewish Philanthropy Resource

  • News Bits
  • Jewish Education
  • Readers Forum
  • Research
  • Show Search
Hide Search
You are here: Home / Readers Forum / “Retail Hubris”: What Jewish Communal Institutions can Learn from Sears

“Retail Hubris”:
What Jewish Communal Institutions can Learn from Sears

June 1, 2018 By eJP

By Doron Kenter

Once upon a time, I was a bankruptcy lawyer. Also once upon a time, I shopped at Sears. Bankruptcy law is now only a hobby, and I can’t remember the last time I walked into a Sears or a Kmart (also owned by Sears Holdings). Now I work in furtherance of excellence in the Jewish community. So what do these things have in common?

Well, a “death watch” for Sears has been going on for some time. Analysts and investors have followed the once-dominant chain’s steady decline, and most expect a bankruptcy filing in the company’s future. At the same time, many critics have pointed to “dying,” “old school,” “stale” Jewish institutions of yore, even to the point of contending that their time has come and gone. This bankruptcy lawyer/Jewish foundation professional has noticed some striking similarities.

First things first: It’s tempting to blame Amazon for Sears’ declining stock price, just as it’s tempting to blame the decline in Jewish engagement on a growing disaffection with religion, traditional institutions, Israel, or anything else. But, as analysts have noted, “Sears’ demise is not all Amazon’s fault, nor is it a simple circle-of-life parable. Sears has made its share of mistakes.”[1] For example, Lowe’s, Best Buy, and Home Depot have all seen their share prices grow significantly, even as Sears has continued its collapse. “Even for a brick-and-mortar retailer in the digital era, Sears is struggling.”[2] It is not enough to simply shake our fists at the sky and lament demographics and the internet for our shrinking synagogues, schools, youth groups, community centers, and other communal institutions. What, then, distinguishes the Sears of the Jewish community from its Best Buy, Home Depot, and Lowe’s? A non-exhaustive list of possibilities follows below.

Maintain a Zealous Pursuit of Excellence, Not Short–Term Numbers

As Sears has struggled, it has kept itself afloat by selling off its most valuable core brands and store after store. Sometimes streamlining is necessary and effective. General Motors did just that during its turnaround, shutting down Pontiac, Saturn, and Hummer, and selling off Saab. And Ford recently announced that it would sell only two cars in the US, focusing instead on trucks, SUVs, and crossovers (its core lines in the US).[3] Sears may still hold $2 billion or more in assets in the form of real estate – but what is at the heart of the Sears value proposition? Where lasting value is compromised for the sake of short-term gains, the future is more foreboding, and bankruptcy filings and/or wind-downs may be inevitable.

Similarly, the Jewish community cannot shed its best assets. If we do so, there will be nothing left to offer. Focus and accessibility are, of course, important. But even if we can generate immediate interest (or keep our statistics from falling) by eliminating meaningful content and emphasizing the “softer side” of doing Jewish, how long will we really last? And to what end? The Jewish community will not have accomplished much if we prop up our numbers by compromising that which is best of what we have to offer.

Excellent (and Good) Management Is Essential

Sears Holdings has had four people serve as CEO since its formation after a merger with Kmart. Its current CEO – also a principal investor – reportedly runs Sears like his hedge fund, driving performance via competition, rather than collaboration.[4] And even though the current CEO has been praised for trying big ideas and continuing to invest his time and resources in the company, he also churns through executives and is (reportedly) often off-site, working remotely and detached from corporate headquarters.[5]

In Jewish communal work, as with most businesses, attitudes, culture, productivity, and innovation must flow from the top. Stability, when it does not come at the expense of competent leadership, is important. And even though not-for-profit and community organizations must be run professionally and with high expectations of all employees, they cannot be run the same way that some might run a profit-driven hedge fund (though perhaps some of the more genial financial wizards would be up to the task). A visionary, thoughtful, and professional leadership team may not alone be enough to assure success. But success rarely comes without one.

Know Your Core Partners and Stakeholders; Treat Them Right

As is the case with many retailers facing a cash crunch, Sears has been delaying payments to suppliers. Those suppliers, dealing with reduced orders as it is, may also be fearful of being left in the lurch in the event of nonpayment or bankruptcy. As a result, suppliers are demanding tighter payment terms and are reluctant to extend credit on the same terms as they might to other business partners.[6] For a retailer, this can be a vicious cycle, straining liquidity and the business model altogether.

Although most Jewish institutions typically don’t deal with the same supply chains, they must treat stakeholders, donors, and other partners well, or risk their departure. At the very least, partners’ patience will wear thin and they may not be as forgiving as they might otherwise be. By showing a commitment to critical stakeholders’ ongoing satisfaction (while remaining faithful to the core mission), the organization’s partners, donors, and funders are more likely to remain loyal, even in the face of adversity. In a competitive Jewish marketplace, stakeholder retention cannot be undervalued.

Don’t Ignore the Low Income Demographic

Sears has also been criticized for ceding the urban lower-income markets to Wal-Mart, Target, and other retailers, especially as it had an opportunity to expand in that sector following the merger with Kmart.[7] Although the lower-income markets may not have been as lucrative, they could have been important drivers of growth.

As a Jewish community, we may be tempted to overlook lower-income communities. To be sure, we have a responsibility to help all those in need. But it must not simply be an act of philanthropy[8]; Jewish communal life is not, and should not be, focused on those of us with the greatest resources. Major growth (and contributions in various forms) can come from those we may have overlooked. To include the less fortunate is both a moral imperative and good business.

Dream Big, But Don’t Bite Off Too Much

We should continue to dream dreams and see visions (see Joel 2:28). And we cannot forget to invest in our future. But at the same time, we should not spend beyond our means or take on more than we can responsibly accomplish, hoping that future success will justify overextension and overexertion. Sears, for example, has taken on significant debt, which will have to be paid down at some point in the future, but revenues may not support those increasingly high repayment obligations.

Our communal organizations must similarly address the tension between large-scale projects and the possibility of meeting expectations with existing or potential resources (funding, human capital, etc.). By all means, we should aim high. But we cannot let our wishful thinking bring us to the point of insurmountable obligations and expectations. To err too far in either direction can be fatal.

A [Timely] Reassessment or Overhaul Can Sometimes Work Wonders

There are times that corporations need to reevaluate their options. Although mergers, bankruptcies, and other strategic transactions can be costly and time-consuming, they can be necessary and, in many instances, they can preserve or generate tremendous value. Where Sears has been keeping itself afloat by selling off core brands and real estate, other companies have found tremendous value when they’ve been able to effect a major reinvention before value was lost.

General Motors is a prime example. A major reboot was necessary, and a chapter 11 filing, coupled with a major investment from the United States Treasury, provided breathing room and other benefits and opportunities to the company. Even though the process was painful for many, the bankruptcy and the transactions effected in that case ultimately allowed the vast majority of dealerships to remain open and the vast majority of employees to keep their jobs. And, as it turns out, the federal government and other investors have been able to reap significant profits with a newly revitalized GM.

Marvel Entertainment is another model. Nearly ten years ago, the comic book company found a match in The Walt Disney Company, which was well positioned to capitalize on the many brands and characters within the Marvel Universe. Disney had the expertise, networks, and financial resources to leverage Marvel’s assets into blockbuster after blockbuster, with all the attendant t-shirt and video game sales to boot.

Jewish communal organizations cannot be afraid of major change. Tremendous value can be created or retained through strategic transactions, even though they may require a reimagining of governance, infrastructure, or business models. Those transactions can the take the form of mergers, consolidations, partnerships, or even orderly wind-downs and dissolution. Waiting too long can result in an unnecessary loss of morale, value, and impact – as well as the human and financial capital used in keeping a not-quite-fruitful venture afloat. Leadership should not be too prideful, and investors should not be so cautious, as to allow our important institutions to descend past the point where their inherent value can be preserved or revived.

Thankfully, we do not live in a society in which debtors are imprisoned or where businesses cannot shrink or wind down. A business’s decline or even failure is not necessarily attributable to any bad or unwise people – such is the nature of business. So too, a not-for-profit organization should not be considered a failure if it needs to move on. But at the very least, perhaps we can learn something from Sears. Even if we buy our lawnmowers on Amazon.

[1] David Floyd, “Who Killed Sears? 50 Years on the Road to Ruin,” Investopedia (May 9, 2018), available at https://www.investopedia.com/news/downfall-of-sears/ (last accessed May 16, 2018)
[2] Id.
[3] See, e.g., Jackie Wattles, “Ford Dropping All but 2 Cars from its North American Dealerships,” CNN Money (April 25, 2018), available at http://money.cnn.com/2018/04/25/autos/ford-cars-north-america/index.html
[4] Mina Kimes, “At Sears, Eddie Lampert’s Warring Divisions Model Adds to the Troubles,” Bloomberg (July 11, 2013), available at https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-07-11/at-sears-eddie-lamperts-warring-divisions-model-adds-to-the-troubles
[5] Michelle Lodge, “Top 4 Reasons Sears Could File Chapter 11 Bankruptcy in 2018,” TheStreet (Jan. 25, 2018), available at https://www.thestreet.com/story/14450394/1/sears-could-bankrupt-in-2018.html
[6] Id.
[7] Id.
[8] See Eric S. Goldstein and Andrés Spokoiny, “Poverty: It’s About Us,” eJewishPhilanthropy (April 24, 2018), available at https://ejewishphilanthropy.com/poverty-its-about-us/

Doron Kenter is a recovering corporate bankruptcy lawyer. He is currently a Program Officer at Maimonides Fund.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: Readers Forum, The American Jewish Scene

Click here to Email This Post Email This Post to friends or colleagues!

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Nathaniel Warshay says

    June 4, 2018 at 5:15 pm

    The story of Detroit’s “auxiliary” JCC building is much like Doron Kenter’s description of Kmart (another Detroit company) and Sears.

    The Oak Park branch served a lower household income area, more concentrated Jewish community, in the heart of the more observant area. Unlike it’s much larger and newer West Bloomfield headquarters, the Oak Park branch was not really a health club for non-Jews, but had been providing many services to senior adults, very young children, and youth and other adults.

    The JCC ran a centralized administration, where one in Oak Park would have to reach out to West Bloomfield to get a light bulb changed. Eventually, the JCC, which did suffer from fiscal mismanagement, now cleared up, began shutting down programs in Oak Park. However, it appears they did so without considering the long game. For example, shutting down the early childhood program meant that a significant number of rooms went unused – there was no replacement programming. Hence, overhead had to be spread on fewer programs and less revenue. Furthermore, getting rid of childcare meant that hundreds of adult visits weekly ceased. These people no longer needed to enter the building, hence, were not invited nor enticed to membership, which was at the same rate as the newer and better equipped West Bloomfield facility (their moto was “One Jewish Center, two building,” albeit 14 miles apart – people just won’t fight that distance or traffic to work out in the morning or evening).

    Other business unfriendly practices drove away Jewish communal events, programming, etc., meaning people had fewer reasons to enter the building.

    As the community’s poor step-child, the building also was blamed for the agency’s fiscal woes, and eventually shut down with the promise to rebuild (it hasn’t yet happened a couple of years later).

    The point, thus is programs (e.g. child care, restaurants, “loss leaders”) that meet people’s needs will draw them in. When they come in, they have the chance to participate in other programs, making the effort more relevant to people. No one ever really cut themselves to full health.

  2. Ruth Schapira says

    June 18, 2018 at 11:58 pm

    Hi Doron,
    After all these years when I knew you as a teacher of teens, I’m pleased to see that you’re working on behalf of the Jewish community for an organization that speaks to students’ minds and hearts. There is much wisdom in what you said and specifically, I responded to “……the Jewish community cannot shed its best assets…..” regarding teen Jewish education.
    Unfortunately many teen programs have folded around the country. As a last attempt at survival, some often undertook a shifting in priorities by (as you state): “…….eliminating meaningful content and emphasizing the “softer side” of doing Jewish…”. As you mention, offering weaker content did not offer the panacea some expected. What we find at The Mussar Institute is that teens respond to meaning-making when content is offered in ways that are relevant to them.
    Fortunately, due to the generosity of a John Templeton Foundation grant, we are able to offer Teen Mussar Programs to schools and they have the opportunity to, at least for this program, not worry about the financial impact of this choice. Thank you again for bringing this conversation forward.

Primary Sidebar

Join The Conversation

What's the best way to follow important issues affecting the Jewish philanthropic world? Our Daily Update keeps you on top of the latest news, trends and opinions shaping the landscape, providing an invaluable source for inspiration and learning.
Sign Up Now
For Email Marketing you can trust.

Continue The Conversation

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Recent Comments

  • Bruce Powell on An Invitation To Transparency: Reflections on an Open Salary Spreadsheet
  • Sara Rigler on Announcement: Catherine Reed named CEO of American Friends of Magen David Adom
  • Donna Burkat on The Blessings in 2020’s Losses
  • swindmueller on Where Do We Go From Here?
    Reflections On 2021
    A Jewish Response to These Uncertain Times
  • Alan Henkin on Where Do We Go From Here?
    Reflections On 2021
    A Jewish Response to These Uncertain Times

Most Read Recent Posts

  • Jewish Agency Accuses Evangelical Contractors of “Numerous Violations” but Denies They Evangelized New Immigrants
  • Breaking: Birthright Israel & Onward Israel Seek to Join Forces to Strengthen Jewish Diaspora Ties with Israel
  • An Invitation To Transparency: Reflections on an Open Salary Spreadsheet
  • Why One Zoom Class Has Generated a Following
  • The Blessings in 2020’s Losses

Categories

The Way Back Machine

Footer

What We Do

eJewish Philanthropy highlights news, resources and thought pieces on issues facing our Jewish philanthropic world in order to create dialogue and advance the conversation. Learn more.

Top 40 Philanthropy Blogs, Websites & Influencers in 2020

Copyright © 2021 · eJewish Philanthropy · All Rights Reserved