• Home
  • About
    • About
    • Policies
  • Submissions
    • Op-eds
    • News / Announcements
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

eJewish Philanthropy

Your Jewish Philanthropy Resource

  • News Bits
  • Jewish Education
  • Readers Forum
  • Research
  • Show Search
Hide Search
You are here: Home / The American Jewish Scene / Responding to Anti-Semitism: Revisiting Old Assumptions, Understanding the New Threats

Responding to Anti-Semitism: Revisiting Old Assumptions, Understanding the New Threats

January 15, 2018 By eJP

Brussels, Belgium – July 26, 2012: Stained Glass depicting the legend of Jews stealing sacramental bread, in the Cathedral of Brussels, Belgium. This antisemitic legend dates back to 1370. Photo via Shutterstock.

By Steven Windmueller, Ph.D.

For more than one hundred years, the American Jewish community was managing its war against anti-Semitism employing a set of accepted community relations tactics. In this article, we are examining ten of the core assumptions that defined the community’s understanding of anti-Semitic behavior with the intent on pushing back against these now out of date value propositions.

  • Anti-Semitism is driven by the un-educated and uninformed. For most of the past one hundred years, the community relations establishment held to the position that in order to “defeat” anti-Semitism, educational initiatives would need to be employed to offset misunderstandings and prejudicial judgments about Jews and Judaism. Indeed, for decades our national agencies launched a series of informational programs designed to dispel myths that were fostered about Jews. Today, however, the new reality suggests that well-educated individuals who know very well their case against the Jews are driving major public efforts to advance contemporary anti-Semitism.
  • In the early decades of the 20th century, the model of Jewish organizing was constructed around the proposition that other like-minded communities will want to coalesce with Jews when opposing hate-based activities. This assumption was based on the common plight of prejudice endured by minority constituencies. Today, there are significantly different and individualized approaches employed by groups in responding to hate-directed attacks. There appears to be no longer a shared strategy for opposing prejudice.
  • Social elites are the essential civic glue necessary to build public support in opposition to anti-Semitism. For decades, the Jewish “defense” strategy was directed toward mobilizing these elites as a wedge in condemning anti-Semitic rhetoric and behavior. As societies have radically changed, these leadership elites no longer carry the same credibility or leverage that they once held, minimizing their impact on social behaviors.
  • The motivation for minority political organizing was based on the collective proposition that these groups endured a shared sense of powerlessness. In this current environment these “traditional” minority communities are no longer necessarily seen as marginalized or without power. As Jews, for example, became “white folks” or were seen by some as part of the established order; their case for victimhood was diminished, just as their enemies now defined them as outside the boundaries of an oppressed peoples. For that matter, the Jewish community in the 21st century is seen by many as “powerful”. Indeed, some have described the contemporary position of Jews in America as the new “WASPS” (White Anglo-Saxon Protestants).
  • At one point Israel was seen as vulnerable, making its case more appealing to potential allies. Today, Israel has become the lynchpin for the new anti-Semitism. The enemies of the Jewish State, for example, have craftily employed Nazi symbols and terms, applying these images to Israel’s conduct. The Jewish community has held to the principle that the Nazi experience in history ought to be treated as unique to a particular ideology and political culture. Jews would contend that any cross-reference to Nazism is inappropriate and has no comparative basis. This thesis has been rejected by those opposed to Israel’s policies and actions.
  • For much of Western history, Jews needed to encounter Christian theological anti-Judaism. Over the course of the 20th century, Christian-Jewish encounters would significantly alter the negative historic patterns associated with Christian religious views on Jews and Judaism. In the Western experience, Jews never formally had to deal with Islam. This is no longer the reality. As Islam has become an integral part of Western political culture and as Muslim influence has expanded, Jews are bereft of a strategy in managing Jewish-Muslim connections on a broad scale, similar to how the community relations field engaged the Christian world.
  • In modern times, anti-Semitism has metastasized to encompass anti-Israelism and other manifestations of political and religious hate. Rather than containing anti-Judaism as a religious expression, the community has actually experienced an explosion in the forms and varieties of anti-Jewish sentiment. In the past the national defense agencies “treated” all varieties of anti-Semitism through the same lens; this proposition no longer has merit.
  • Some Jews operated on the proposition that history is linear, implying that past injustices and prejudices will give way over time to a more enlightened understanding of the human condition. Under this notion, anti-Semitic behavior and other forms of social hatred will dissipate as individuals are exposed to the shared story of all peoples. Sadly, history has not cooperated with this notion.
  • The promise of 20th century nationalism and the founding of the Zionist Movement held out the mistaken assumption that creating a “nation-state” for the Jewish people would forever end anti-Semitism, as Jews would be perceived as having their own national identity, thereby removing the seeds of anti-Jewish rhetoric and behavior, as Jews would be seen “like other peoples”.
  • The policy of “isolation” that defined Jewish practice toward anti-Semitism for much of the 20th Century no longer works. Historically, Jewish institutions opted to embrace the strategy of systematically “isolating” bigots and anti-Semites. Today, with the presence of social media and other vehicles of communication, it is no longer possible to separate out such voices of hate.

If anti-Semitism was at one time seen as either being generated by the “right” or from the “left”, today there is a simultaneous assault on Jewish interests by groups on both edges of the political spectrum, further challenging the communal order.

As anti-Semitism reasserts its presence on the political stage, these new threats present significant and different challenges to the Jewish community relations enterprise. The traditional policy assumptions are now being tested. The historic practice of “containment” is no longer a viable strategy, but neither are the existing organizing principles. As new threats emerge and old ones are revived, the Jewish communal system will require a different framework for political and religious engagement in managing these wars against the Jews.

Steven Windmueller Ph. D. on behalf of the Wind Group, Consulting for the Jewish Future. Dr. Windmueller’s collection of articles can be found on his website: www.thewindreport.com.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: The American Jewish Scene

Click here to Email This Post Email This Post to friends or colleagues!

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Rabbi Hayim Herring says

    January 15, 2018 at 3:46 am

    An additional observation to this excellent article is that social networks also empower grassroots organizations to spread anti-Semitism, a reality that organized elites cannot control with top down programmatic efforts.

  2. Paul Shaviv says

    January 16, 2018 at 4:01 pm

    Many years ago (at the epic WUJS Philadelphia gathering) I heard a talk by Gerhard Riegner z’l. Before his wartime activity in Geneva, he worked for the Jewish Community in Berlin during the 1930’s. He was asked whether the Jewish community could have done anything to combat the rise of Nazism. “no”, he replied,”but we could have acted differently. Our enemies fought from the gutter. We were gentlemen. If they made some new accusation, we countered it by getting a Professor to write a learned article showing that it was historically or theologically untrue. We published it in a leading German newspaper, preferably under the signature of a Churchman or a sympathetic Christian academic. It was a mistake. We should have got down in the gutter and fought our enemies there.”

    Steve Windmueller’s truly excellent article carries a similar message by implication. Hayim Herring’s comment could also point out that social networks also offer opportunities to be proactive and aggressive.

    But the failure to appreciate or deal with the changed phenomenon of antisemitism, correctly and accurately outlined above, is actually not a problem – it is a *symptom* of a much larger problem. In general, our community institutions big and small have not yet adapted to the rapidly changing Jewish and non-Jewish world around us. They are therefore distancing themselves from their own constituencies, and are less and less effective in dealing with the outside world. Not a good situation…….

    Again, and excellent article – thank you!

  3. Clint Wilson says

    January 16, 2018 at 6:39 pm

    Better understanding social media is not the problem. Social media is understood just fine by the digital natives who will inherit our choices.

    If you are being criticized from both right, left and also from within – when you do take a moment and ask yourself why this might be happening? We Jews seem to have a long history when it comes to wrongs committed against us, but we quickly shy away from actions we have taken against those whom we have harmed to get what we want from this world.

  4. Mr. Cohen says

    January 16, 2018 at 6:59 pm

    Dear Paul Shaviv,

    You quoted Gerhard Riegner as saying:

    “We should have got down in the gutter and fought our [Nazi] enemies there.”

    In the 1970s and 1980s, that exact approach was used by Rabbi Meir Kahane and his Jewish Defense League (JDL) organization.

    When Jewish women in California were being bullied by Iranian “students”, the JDL beat-up the anti-Jewish bullies.

    Rabbi Meir Kahane and his Jewish Defense League were constantly condemned by respectable Jewish establishment organizations and respectable Jewish newspapers, no matter how effective they were in helping Jews – much more effective in helping Jews than the respectable Jews who condemned them.

    Rabbi Meir Kahane and his Jewish Defense League vanished long ago, and nobody does what they used to do. What would Gerhard Riegner say?

    Sincerely,
    Mr. Cohen

  5. Rabbi Alan Henkin says

    January 16, 2018 at 11:43 pm

    On the idea that history is linear and anti-Semitism will dissipate over time: “Sadly history has not cooperated with this notion.” Great line! And all too true! History is often circular rather than linear, much to our Jewish dismay.

  6. Danny O says

    January 17, 2018 at 9:06 am

    Israel has numerous activists, organized both ad hoc (IDC) or more formally as IDF units, that are fighting a battle on social media supporting Israel’s interests.
    This model can be copied to fight anti semitism. Which major US Jewish organization will take the challenge? Or perhaps JAFI or Israel’s Ministry of Diaspora affairs?

  7. Dan Brown says

    January 17, 2018 at 12:08 pm

    JAFI or the Ministrfy of Diaspora Affairs? Guess you want failure pre-determined!

Primary Sidebar

Join The Conversation

What's the best way to follow important issues affecting the Jewish philanthropic world? Our Daily Update keeps you on top of the latest news, trends and opinions shaping the landscape, providing an invaluable source for inspiration and learning.
Sign Up Now
For Email Marketing you can trust.

Continue The Conversation

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Recent Comments

  • Bruce Powell on An Invitation To Transparency: Reflections on an Open Salary Spreadsheet
  • Sara Rigler on Announcement: Catherine Reed named CEO of American Friends of Magen David Adom
  • Donna Burkat on The Blessings in 2020’s Losses
  • swindmueller on Where Do We Go From Here?
    Reflections On 2021
    A Jewish Response to These Uncertain Times
  • Alan Henkin on Where Do We Go From Here?
    Reflections On 2021
    A Jewish Response to These Uncertain Times

Most Read Recent Posts

  • Jewish Agency Accuses Evangelical Contractors of “Numerous Violations” but Denies They Evangelized New Immigrants
  • Breaking: Birthright Israel & Onward Israel Seek to Join Forces to Strengthen Jewish Diaspora Ties with Israel
  • An Invitation To Transparency: Reflections on an Open Salary Spreadsheet
  • Why One Zoom Class Has Generated a Following
  • The Blessings in 2020’s Losses

Categories

The Way Back Machine

Footer

What We Do

eJewish Philanthropy highlights news, resources and thought pieces on issues facing our Jewish philanthropic world in order to create dialogue and advance the conversation. Learn more.

Top 40 Philanthropy Blogs, Websites & Influencers in 2020

Copyright © 2021 · eJewish Philanthropy · All Rights Reserved