• Home
  • About
    • About
    • Policies
  • Submissions
    • Op-eds
    • News / Announcements
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

eJewish Philanthropy

Your Jewish Philanthropy Resource

  • News Bits
  • Jewish Education
  • Readers Forum
  • Research
  • Show Search
Hide Search
You are here: Home / Jewish Philanthropy / Power, Influence, and the Limits of Maps: A Response to Yehuda Kurtzer

Power, Influence, and the Limits of Maps: A Response to Yehuda Kurtzer

July 2, 2019 By eJP

By Andrés Spokoiny

In his article, “‘The Establishment’ Has No Clothes: The New Jewish ‘Influence Economy,’” the always brilliant and thoughtful Yehuda Kurtzer raises intriguing points and does the Jewish communal world a great service by calling attention to the fact that the way we too commonly discuss our communal structures is woefully out of date.

I’d like to add a few angles to this conversation about the “economy of power,” without which our understanding of that new reality will be incomplete.

1. From the Collective to the Individual

Trying to ascertain what organizations or leaders (“establishment” or younger ones) have power and influence today misses what’s probably the key characteristic of power in our days. Power hasn’t simply shifted from one set of organizations to another, or from one group of influencers to another; rather, in the 21st century, power has shifted from the collective to the individual. In the new “economy of power,” as Yehuda calls it, the key player is the individual Jew. That revolution in the structure of power affects all organizations: “establishment” ones and new ones, startups and blue chips. What makes our times unique is not the existence of parallel structures of power; after all, in every society in history a formal power hierarchy co-existed with an informal one. What makes our times unique is the collapse of every institutional structure of power. The main vector of power today is the hyper-empowered individual who makes her own choices with unprecedented freedom. Thus, power doesn’t shift from one set of organizations to another; it atomizes to each individual member of the community.

The idea of the collective as such is questioned. Every collective structure, every institution is hit in equal measure – except those that understand that the hyper-empowered individual needs to be at the center of their exercise of power.

2. From Stable Memberships to Transactional Platforms

In this new regime, two actors concentrate power: the individual and the owner of the platforms. Individuals are hyper-empowered but they still need to interact with others. The ones with the biggest power among social actors are not organizations in the traditional sense but platforms. In our times, the biggest hotel company doesn’t own a single hotel room and the biggest taxi company doesn’t own a single car; they own the platform upon which sovereign individuals connect.

Here’s the catch: in a world of atomized individuals connecting via central platforms, power is not just bimodal, but also fundamentally divided. Platforms tend to exert strong control over the terms of interaction (since it’s so difficult for individuals to connect without them), but limited control over the content, which takes most (though not all) of its cues from the aggregate behaviors of the individuals. The reverse is true for individuals, who use their choices to “vote” for the content presented to them among the near-infinite choices on the platforms, but have little say regarding the terms of the interaction.

How this still-developing trend will reshape Jewish life is still very much an unanswered question.

3. From Social Media to Close Social Networks. Casual influence is trivially easy to measure, but meaningful influence is far more difficult to quantify. Measures like social media followership are limited. Even more sophisticated metrics of social media influence generally fail to take into account whom is being influenced, or how credible the influencer ought to be; I wouldn’t like to be operated on by a surgeon who’s more influenced by Twitter than The Lancet.

At the 2013 JFN Conference, James Fowler told this story: a celebrity tweeted praise for his book, and Fowler was elated. He was sure that sales would spike. But they didn’t. Fowler later went on to study influence within social networks, and found that while people may have casual ties to countless people, most people actually act on recommendations and social cues from about 6 people who are close to them.

Analyses of influence within the Jewish community can and should distinguish between “light” influence and the kind of “heavy” influence that comes with strong, close relationships.

4. From Maps to Snapshots

Since power in this new situation is so divided and dynamic, I must quibble with Yehuda’s desire for a new “map” of power. A map is a model of a territory that changes relatively slowly, as the physical world has tended to do. Even in the physical realm, the constant wanderings of Google’s camera cars reveal that even physical maps are always changing, and how much more quickly our social realities change. I fear that anything presenting itself as a “map” may mislead us when our knowledge of the relevant dynamics remain so uncertain.

To illustrate this point consider this example: a national organization is truly representative of the enormous majority of the Jews in the country. Yet, one day, the president decides to ignore that organization and deal with a voice that is more sympathetic to his political needs. He then picks a “friendly” Jewish voice, that may not be at all representative of anybody beyond a dozen activists. Yet, that “powerless” Jewish organization became very powerful overnight.

Yes, power shifts are not an invention of the 21st century; in antiquity a king would die, a vizier would fall out of favor, a new conqueror would arrive and the power economy would be radically altered. But the rapid pace of change and the uncertainty surrounding it are unique to our time; the empowerment of the individual adds to this unpredictability. Sometimes the dynamics of power can’t be mapped at all, and can be only understood a posteriori, like the unseen social currents that brought Donald Trump to power.

Perhaps instead of maps, we should think of new understandings of Jewish communal power and influence as snapshots – incomplete pictures of a dynamic reality that look artificially still, which we use to inform our knowledge of the world, even as we understand that even a moment after the snapshot is taken, something new may charge wildly into the frame. A map is something you might update once a year; to really understand life through snapshots, you need a lot more of them – perhaps even frequently enough to make them into a film.

Or perhaps power these days can be likened to neural networks in the human brain: always changing, always readjusting itself. One can get indeed a picture of the brain’s morphology, but only a real-time FMRI can tell you how the brain is working at a given time.

Like everything else, power and influence in the Jewish community are undergoing enormous transformations. Individual empowerment; rapid change; unpredictability and disruption are the underlying features of these new realities and are affecting everything in our world. It’s critical to fully understand these as we attempt to understand power.

Andrés Spokoiny is President & CEO, Jewish Funders Network.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: Jewish Philanthropy, Readers Forum, The American Jewish Scene

Click here to Email This Post Email This Post to friends or colleagues!

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Bob Hyfler says

    July 2, 2019 at 4:50 pm

    It is sadly disingenuous, by both authors, to discuss power and influence in Jewish life without at least a passing nod to the growing privatization of direction setting in communal affairs and the ambitions and influence of those with vast resources and particular agendas. While some might see it as a good thing, a corrective to perceived institutional stasis and mediocrity, others of us might view it as an unchecked assault on the participatory if not democratic ethos in Jewish life. A condition that begs for reforms and creative new modes of collective decision making and engagement.

  2. Jordan Goodman says

    July 2, 2019 at 5:57 pm

    Shalom Andres,

    You wrote: “The idea of the collective as such is questioned.”

    For contemporary North American non Orthodox (NAnO) Jews, “the idea of a (Jewish) collective” is at best a mirage and has been for a long time. The leadership of “Jewish” communal organizations/institutions has never had the authority to speak for NAnO Jewry. And the North American melting pot aka assimilation has been the underlying engine of the atomization of which you speak. Tech, is but an accelerator of this inexorable process. You later wrote:

    “Analyses of influence within the Jewish community can and should distinguish between ‘light’ influence and the kind of ‘heavy’ influence that comes with strong, close relationships.”

    Ahh…the difference between Facebook “friends” and the real deal in broad relief!! And this difference begs the question: what is the etiology of REAL friends; of REAL close relationships?

    Power is morally neutral. Its wielding is not. Going forward, what will serve as the moral compass/anchor for “just, kind and humble (see Micah 6:8)” leadership?

    Biv’racha,
    Jordan Goodman
    Wheeling, IL
    eashtov@aol.com

  3. andres spokoiny says

    July 2, 2019 at 7:50 pm

    Bob, thanks for your comments. And a response:
    1 – If don’t think that neither Yehuda or myself willfully ignored that phenomenon. We have both discussed it extensively in other fora (and both JFN and Hartmann have developed conceptual tools to discuss the ethical questions around funders’ power). But in these articles, we were both focusing on how to understand power dynamics rather than describing who “owns” that power and how they use it. The phenomenon you describe is part of what needs to be understood and mapped if one wants to operate effectively.
    2 – To that effect, I’d say that the phenomenon you describe is real but not new. Jewish Life (at least in America) was never truly democratic. Boards in organizations are appointed by other board members, not voted in by “Amcha”. The major donor of a Federation had probably the same level of power that an independent philanthropist has today if not more. True, there were participatory mechanism like budget committees and allocations processes, but the major donor was rarely outvoted. And – to the point of truly understanding power – the actual power of “an individual with a lot of resources and a particular agenda” is less than what we may assume it to be. Many programs in the Jewish World (and beyond) received enormous injections of capital and yet failed, which shows that power dynamics are not so linear. Most of the Jewish mega philanthropists actually operate in partnership with other funders or with communal organizations, which reduces their power to dictate conditions and positions. So when analyzing power, one has to understand the whole complexity of it.
    3 – Maybe the “empowerment of the individual” that I describe (when applied to “the Jew in the street”) can lead to the development of new mechanisms of participation that are more democratic than what existed in the past. In that vein, I agree with you that this new “economy of power” as Yehuda calls it, (coupled with technologies that facilitate participation) opens exciting opportunities for new forms of collective decision making, and one has to think creatively about how to leverage this.

  4. Bob Hyfler says

    July 2, 2019 at 11:17 pm

    Thank you Andres for your thoughtful response to my comments. I will focus this comment on your second point pertaining to the historic role of mega donors in communal decision making. As I argued elsewhere:
    https://ejewishphilanthropy.com/the-rise-of-the-mega-donor-and-the-privatization-of-organized-jewish-life/
    there often comes a point where a difference in degree becomes a difference in kind. The deference that mega donors once showed to institution boards has changed dramatically not for the better. As one of the greatest of early generation once told me, “My standing and influence is very often linked to ‘keeping my gun in it’s holster’..”
    On a more hopeful note, I believe there are practical correctives such as citizens assemblies which I argue for below. I would challenge the JFN (whose earliest history is rooted in Democratic impulses) to take a lead in sponsoring such participatory interventions. It’s worth a think.
    https://ejewishphilanthropy.com/the-open-jewish-community-from-no-boundaries-to-communal-assemblies/

Primary Sidebar

Join The Conversation

What's the best way to follow important issues affecting the Jewish philanthropic world? Our Daily Update keeps you on top of the latest news, trends and opinions shaping the landscape, providing an invaluable source for inspiration and learning.
Sign Up Now
For Email Marketing you can trust.

Continue The Conversation

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Recent Comments

  • Bruce Powell on An Invitation To Transparency: Reflections on an Open Salary Spreadsheet
  • Sara Rigler on Announcement: Catherine Reed named CEO of American Friends of Magen David Adom
  • Donna Burkat on The Blessings in 2020’s Losses
  • swindmueller on Where Do We Go From Here?
    Reflections On 2021
    A Jewish Response to These Uncertain Times
  • Alan Henkin on Where Do We Go From Here?
    Reflections On 2021
    A Jewish Response to These Uncertain Times

Most Read Recent Posts

  • What Title for Henrietta Szold?
  • Jewish Agency Accuses Evangelical Contractors of “Numerous Violations” but Denies They Evangelized New Immigrants
  • An Invitation To Transparency: Reflections on an Open Salary Spreadsheet
  • Why One Zoom Class Has Generated a Following
  • The Blessings in 2020’s Losses

Categories

The Way Back Machine

Footer

What We Do

eJewish Philanthropy highlights news, resources and thought pieces on issues facing our Jewish philanthropic world in order to create dialogue and advance the conversation. Learn more.

Top 40 Philanthropy Blogs, Websites & Influencers in 2020

Copyright © 2021 · eJewish Philanthropy · All Rights Reserved