• Home
  • About
    • About
    • Policies
  • Submissions
    • Op-eds
    • News / Announcements
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

eJewish Philanthropy

Your Jewish Philanthropy Resource

  • News Bits
  • Jewish Education
  • Readers Forum
  • Research
  • Show Search
Hide Search
You are here: Home / Managing Your Nonprofit / When Bad Things Happen to Good Agencies: An Opening Series of Observations

When Bad Things Happen to Good Agencies: An Opening Series of Observations

February 11, 2015 By eJP

By Robert Hyfler, PhD

The sociologist C. Wright Mills once observed that a single marital divorce can often be attributed to factors unique to that couple while a significant increase in the divorce rate indicates that larger societal issues are at play. So too, the spate of financial crises, bankruptcies and overt scandals in the nonprofit world begs the question, “what’s going on and what can be done about it?”

I would posit that a collection of factors have led us to this point:

  • The increase in the number of executive skills and roles required at the top, not easily managed by a single individual – visionary, fundraiser, financial manager;
  • The bad collective decision that being “fundraiser in chief” tops all the other roles and skill requirements of the CEO;
  • The ego and hubris of highly compensated executives who are reluctant to admit that they are seldom experts in all things nonprofit and hence do not balance their unique skills with those of others. CEO’s can be too late in seeking the advice, counsel and direction of others within their organization and on their board.
  • Nonprofit boards that overly defer decision making and oversight to their CEO’s;
  • A 21st century trend among the best and brightest – philanthropists, laity and professionals – to be overly focused on specific outcomes and projects and not on organizational and structural issues and the systemic health of agency networks;
  • To borrow the language of Sir Isaiah Berlin, the nonprofit world has too many “hedgehogs,” focused on one supreme philanthropic goal and one overarching strategy to get there. We lack “foxes” who understand the need to balance multiple ends and multiple approaches and can hence change course when events and opportunities present themselves.
  • The privatization of major gifts philanthropy which has diminished the talent available for board involvement, structural ownership, partnership and direction and can take an individual agency, “on the whim of a large gift,” into new, at times inadvisable, waters;
  • A tendency (by no means universal) among our wealthiest 1% to disrespect the talents and culture of the nonprofit world and recreate nonprofit structures in their own image;
  • The at times productive and at times uneasy partnership between the government sector and the nonprofit world where competing value systems, ways of doing business and definitions of financial accountability conflict. Couple that with the allure of large government contracts – even when they undermine the culture, mission and long term viability of the agency.

The corrective to the above ills begins with the following:

  • The introduction of a serious system wide discussion on the above points, individually and in total;
  • An increased examination and consideration of collective executive leadership where the individual at the top shares powers and responsibilities with others possessing complimentary skills and where multiple checks and accountability mechanisms are in place;
  • An awareness among boards of directors that neither the CEO nor the chairman of the board are omnipotent in all things organizational. On too many boards the CEO is seen in Technicolor while subordinate leadership are perceived in black and white;
  • The recognition that fundraising may be a vital, essential executive function but is nevertheless a by-product of organizational mission, programmatic uniqueness, service excellence, integrity and vision;
  • A culture of humility and servant leadership among our top executives. We must eschew any sense of personal entitlement and remind ourselves that we entered this “business” to change the world for the better. Attractive yet reasonable compensation packages are a pleasant additive that can and should be expected with success.
  • A renewed focus on the health and interdependence of our nonprofit system and the structural supports necessary for effective service delivery and programmatic outcomes – executive training programs that balance the why, the what and the how;
  • A sustained re-empowerment of nonprofit boards with a co-commitment to board accountability. The reset of roles should also include an examination of the strengths and limitations of consultancies that can at times be as much a part of the problem as part of the solution.
  • A recognition by even the wealthiest and most powerful philanthropists that their nonprofit activities serve a “public good” and hence must be held accountable to communal and public input, collaboration and oversight. Two, ten or even twenty philanthropists coming together in a room does not in itself constitute a “public” endeavor;
  • A serious re-examination of public-nonprofit partnerships with due and equal respect for each of the sectors, their purposes and cultures. (As a final aside, the voluntary sector has public policy interests but political advocacy is not our founding mission.)

Bob Hyfler, currently an organizational consultant, was recruited to the voluntary sector in 1981. He can be reached at bobhyfler@comcast.net

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Filed Under: Managing Your Nonprofit, The American Jewish Scene Tagged With: federation impact, the ghosts of JFNA

Click here to Email This Post Email This Post to friends or colleagues!

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Mary Ann Oppenheimer says

    February 11, 2015 at 1:35 pm

    Excellent insights in this article into the issues facing many not-for-profits, both small and large.

  2. Paul Drazen says

    February 11, 2015 at 3:45 pm

    The comment “… philanthropists, laity and professionals – to be overly focused on specific outcomes and projects and not on organizational and structural issues and the systemic health of agency networks…” especially rings true. New projects, concepts and ideas are the vital life-blood of growing agency but without basic infrastructure support, even the best ideas cannot gain traction.
    A question for agencies and philanthropists to explore is how to review, redesign and fund the support structure needed to allow innovation.

Primary Sidebar

Join The Conversation

What's the best way to follow important issues affecting the Jewish philanthropic world? Our Daily Update keeps you on top of the latest news, trends and opinions shaping the landscape, providing an invaluable source for inspiration and learning.
Sign Up Now
For Email Marketing you can trust.

Continue The Conversation

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Recent Comments

  • Adam Weisberg on Mitzvah Day: Good, But (Maybe) Not Tikkun Olam
  • Janice Traison on Jewish Overnight Camping for Families:
    A Series of Articles for Exploration
  • Edmund Case on Honeymoon Israel is not an “Interfaith Couples” Trip to Israel
  • Judith Mentzer on Reinventing the Jewish Public Square: Promoting a Jewish Community Relations Model for the 21st Century
  • Steven Windmueller on Reinventing the Jewish Public Square: Promoting a Jewish Community Relations Model for the 21st Century

Categories

Archives

Footer

What We Do

eJewish Philanthropy highlights news, resources and thought pieces on issues facing our Jewish philanthropic world in order to create dialogue and advance the conversation. Learn more.

Top 40 Philanthropy Blogs and Websites to Follow in 2018

Copyright © 2018 · eJewish Philanthropy · All Rights Reserved