• Home
  • About
    • About
    • Policies
  • Submissions
    • Op-eds
    • News / Announcements
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

eJewish Philanthropy

Your Jewish Philanthropy Resource

  • News Bits
  • Jewish Education
  • Readers Forum
  • Research
  • Show Search
Hide Search
You are here: Home / Jewish Philanthropy / What Would Rambam Think About Everyone Using His Ladder?

What Would Rambam Think About Everyone Using His Ladder?

February 9, 2012 By eJP

by Robert Lichtman

Thanks to Dawne Bear Novicoff and Adene Sacks who posted their thoughts about the value-added of philanthropic advisors (What Would Rambam Think About DonorsChoose.org?). I am not such an advisor, but I do believe that making significant investment decisions that impact our future is not a DIY activity.

Theirs is a complex argument which they attempted to frame using Rambam’s handy-dandy Tzedakah Ladder. If you don’t know what that is, your philanthropic advisor does. And the extent to which is it applied or misapplied is the issue.

According to the famous hierarchy of giving habits and attitudes developed by Rambam in the 12th century and still hyper-relevant today, the highest form of tzedakah-giving is when one helps a person out of poverty or joblessness with a gift, a loan, or even better, a job. And it would be best if both parties remain unknown to each other to protect personal dignity.

While the ladder is a useful tool, I think we have a problem if anyone, professional advisors or amateur tzedakah donors, use this ladder exclusively and for the wrong jobs. It would be like using a ladder to dig a ditch or to hang a painting. You could do it, but it would be messy, and the outcome poor. Rambam’s hierarchy of giving was designed to help an individual deepen his compassion towards another individual who needs help, to make the donor and recipient partners, even if unknown to each other, in an intensely personal interaction.

But when it comes to individuals responding to communal needs, the situation is different, and so are Rambam’s rules. For example, confidentiality does not trump all, certainly when turning a non-donor into a donor. Rambam codifies a system that depicts a Tzedakah Squad collecting tzedakah from donors in the public square. And if someone refuses to give, or to give enough, the Tzedakah Squad is empowered to isolate the non-giver in jail or to use physical pressure to get him to do the right thing.

Today we put the pressure on a bit differently. We use Donor Recognition to honor donors and to persuade non-donors. Whether we “call cards” or put up plaques or qualify attendance at events based on giving levels, we publicly broadcast that these people are helping others – and that people who are like them should do the same. Instead of Rambam’s prison-pressure we use modern peer pressure, and it works. If that is distasteful to you, then look at it another way. Let’s call it publicly acknowledging people who do the right thing. People have various motivations for giving – To do good, to feel good, to look good. If making generous people look good results in other people doing good, then … it’s all good.

Rambam’s ladder is a tool that allows one individual to connect with another individual. Rambam codified other laws that guide our support of communal needs. But moving beyond the individual and moving beyond the communal we are now in an entirely different era, the era of institutional giving. That means giving not to individuals or to local committees, but to organizations. For organizations that have a mission to help the poor, or support Jewish education, or redeem captive individuals or communities, we can use Rambam’s other non-ladder rules.

But there are issues which Rambam never contemplated, which donors and donor advisors wrestle with, and for which the ladder is clearly unhelpful. Rambam’s ladder leads us nowhere when we need guidance to support efforts to confront Holocaust denial, protect Jewish rights in the workplace, or maintain global networks to report and analyze events that impact on our community. Rambam’s ladder does not support us when we want to aid Jewish families that are falling apart, agunot who are chained to dead marriages, or marginalized youth. Rambam’s ladder falls short of helping us consider how to cure Jewish genetic diseases, give respite to families caring for children with special needs, or provide day care for isolated elderly.

The ladder has its place, but often we need other tools and Rambam acknowledges this; we should, too. The teens in our Iris Teen Tzedakah program know this. When faced with an array of compelling proposals to fund with their own money, they applied Rambam’s ladder to the communal palette of needs and found that the only thing they could fund if they wanted to aspire to the highest level of the ladder was our community’s Jewish Vocational Service. JVS got the funds, but we needed different tools to assess the rest.

So pull out the ladder when you see an individual who needs help. Climb the ladder as high as you can. Then put the ladder away. You may need a different tool for the next tzedakah opportunity that comes along.

Robert Lichtman is the Executive Director of The Partnership for Jewish Learning and Life, the Jewish Identity-Building organization in MetroWest, NJ.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: Jewish Philanthropy, The Blog Tagged With: tzedakah

Click here to Email This Post Email This Post to friends or colleagues!

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. arnie draiman says

    February 9, 2012 at 1:13 pm

    robert – thank you for taking the time to write about this.

    a few comments, if i may:

    a) you wrote “And it would be best if both parties remain unknown to each other to protect personal dignity.” rambam does not say that at all. being anonymous is not a pre-req when giving a loan or a job.

    b) could you elaborate on why rambam’s ladder doesn’t apply to any of these: “Rambam’s ladder leads us nowhere when we need guidance to support efforts to confront Holocaust denial, protect Jewish rights in the workplace, or maintain global networks to report and analyze events that impact on our community. Rambam’s ladder does not support us when we want to aid Jewish families that are falling apart, agunot who are chained to dead marriages, or marginalized youth. Rambam’s ladder falls short of helping us consider how to cure Jewish genetic diseases, give respite to families caring for children with special needs, or provide day care for isolated elderly.”

    i am missing the connection. why can’t you aid families which are falling apart or agunot or youth at risk? why can’t you support those causes which confront Holocaust denial or work to cure genetic diseases? everything can certainly fit on the ladder.

    perhaps, the main thing is to understand the ladder for what it is and for what it isn’t. rambam did not say ‘that tzedakah funds should only be used for giving a job or a loan in order to help your fellow’ rather, he wrote about varying degrees of how to give tzedakah. give like this or like that – it depends on the situation. happy to discuss this further.

  2. Robert Lichtman says

    February 9, 2012 at 9:13 pm

    Thanks for your thoughtful comments. My point is that the ladder is helpful as a guide for interpersonal situations. The ladder encourages me to give cheerfully, generously and proactively. Its only relevance for institutional giving is that – how cheerfully, generously or proactively to give. It does not help me to set priorities, which is the dilemma faced by donors and advisors in a world of increasing needs and opportunties to address those needs. Rambam has other codes for other situations – and does set priorities through them. Too often we whip out the ladder and the conversation ends there. Life is more complex, so is Rambam.

Primary Sidebar

Join The Conversation

What's the best way to follow important issues affecting the Jewish philanthropic world? Our Daily Update keeps you on top of the latest news, trends and opinions shaping the landscape, providing an invaluable source for inspiration and learning.
Sign Up Now
For Email Marketing you can trust.

Continue The Conversation

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Recent Comments

  • Bruce Powell on An Invitation To Transparency: Reflections on an Open Salary Spreadsheet
  • Sara Rigler on Announcement: Catherine Reed named CEO of American Friends of Magen David Adom
  • Donna Burkat on The Blessings in 2020’s Losses
  • swindmueller on Where Do We Go From Here?
    Reflections On 2021
    A Jewish Response to These Uncertain Times
  • Alan Henkin on Where Do We Go From Here?
    Reflections On 2021
    A Jewish Response to These Uncertain Times

Most Read Recent Posts

  • Jewish Agency Accuses Evangelical Contractors of “Numerous Violations” but Denies They Evangelized New Immigrants
  • Breaking: Birthright Israel & Onward Israel Seek to Join Forces to Strengthen Jewish Diaspora Ties with Israel
  • An Invitation To Transparency: Reflections on an Open Salary Spreadsheet
  • Why One Zoom Class Has Generated a Following
  • The Blessings in 2020’s Losses

Categories

The Way Back Machine

Footer

What We Do

eJewish Philanthropy highlights news, resources and thought pieces on issues facing our Jewish philanthropic world in order to create dialogue and advance the conversation. Learn more.

Top 40 Philanthropy Blogs, Websites & Influencers in 2020

Copyright © 2021 · eJewish Philanthropy · All Rights Reserved