eJewish Philanthropy

Your Jewish Philanthropy Resource

You are here: Home / Research / New Study of Young Judaea Alumni Finds High Levels of Jewish and Israel Engagement Years and Decades Later

New Study of Young Judaea Alumni Finds High Levels of Jewish and Israel Engagement Years and Decades Later

By

A new study conducted for Young Judaea (YJ) documents high levels of Jewish engagement years after the alumni participated in the youth movement’s programming. Conducted by Professor Steven M. Cohen, Research Professor of Jewish Social Policy at HUC-JIR and Director of the Berman Jewish Policy Archive at Stanford University, the survey reported high levels of religious practice, Jewish lifestyle engagement, and Israel attachment.

The study surveyed 1,937 alumni age 18 and above, for an 18% response rate. Among the US sub-sample (N=1,599) which set aside the many Young Judaeans who had made Aliyah and the few others living outside the US, the survey found:

  • 90% of those married have a Jewish spouse
  • 92% feel very or somewhat attached to Israel
  • 93% attended a Passover Seder in the past year
  • 42% of those with school-age children send them to Jewish day schools

“Young Judaea appears to strongly create a connected alumni community of individuals who are highly engaged in Jewish life and Israel,” said Professor Cohen.

Particularly notable were several comparisons of Young Judaea alumni age 25 to 39, and respondents to the 2013 Pew Research Center Portrait of Jewish Americans who were the same age, and similar parental and Jewish education background:

  • 74% of young adult Young Judaea alumni reported that being Jewish is very important to them, versus 47% of Pew respondents of the same age, adjusted for parents’ inmarriage, denomination, and Jewish schooling;
  • 59% of young adult Young Judaea alumni report having mostly Jewish friends, versus 35% for the statistically adjusted comparable Pew respondents of the same age.

Overall, for similar comparisons of all adults, the study also found sizeable differences between the YJ alumni and the sub-sample from the Pew study. Among YJ alumni, 68% have mostly Jewish friends, as compared with 38% in the Pew comparison group. Other indicators with sizeable gaps include Shabbat candle-lighting (54% vs. 28%), in-marriage (90% vs. 70%), and feeling very attached to Israel (63% vs. 44%).

These comparisons, and the influence of Young Judaea on its alumni, are even more apparent when compared to Pew study respondents at large (see: YJ Alumni Highlights Executive Summary / infograph).

“Young Judaea’s highly meaningful immersive experiences of summer camps and Israel programs, coupled with transformative peer leadership opportunities provides a holistic socializing and educational system that inspires life-long connectedness,” said Simon Klarfeld, Executive Director of Young Judaea and veteran Jewish educator.

Additionally, the levels of Jewish engagement from the 2017 survey nearly matched or surpassed that of the last study of Young Judaea alumni, conducted in 1998, on almost all of the major indicators of Jewish engagement. The only exception found was in lower levels of synagogue and Jewish organizational membership, reflecting larger trends in Jewish life and American society. “The parallels between 1998 and 2017 are particularly impressive given the many changes in the American Jewish community in the last 20 years,” said Professor Cohen.

“For those who are understandably concerned about the future of the American Jewish community, the policy implications generated by this survey are very clear,” said Klarfeld. “Young Judaea experiences – whether in America or Israel – continue to lead the field of pluralist Jewish and Israel programming in having a positive and lasting impact on former participants. Young Judaea offers a proven answer to the question of how we should be engaging and educating young Jews today.”

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Click here to Email This Post Email This Post to friends or colleagues!

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. This article also does a crafty job of blurring the lines between engaged in Jewish life and being engaged with Israel – two different things. As a Jew living in TX, I have to say that we have a strong Jewish community here that is being built around the idea of what it means to be an American Jew. Maybe it’s just the Texan in me, but a new study conducted for an organization found that that very organization is the bee’s knees? Please forgive me if I have a little doubt here and say that this may be a PR piece with an agenda.

  2. Sounds like YJ is a good experience for those who choose to participate in its activities. For example, a certain subset of predominantly Conservative Jews with rather specific backgrounds (for example, look at the linked study findings, and pay attention to the demograhics and experiential backgrounds of those who responded to the survey). But as any social scientist knows, correlation is not causation, and the self-selection inherent in those who choose to respond to the survey almost certainly skews the results. Statistical “correction” with the “matched” PEW sample might, or might not, increase the validity of Cohen’s findings. Interpreting these findings in a causal manner, implying that YJ experiences are universally good and impactful for all Jewish youth, without the necessary cautions is sloppy science.

  3. Clint – I think your criticism is unfounded – “Conducted by Professor Steven M. Cohen, Research Professor of Jewish Social Policy at HUC-JIR and Director of the Berman Jewish Policy Archive at Stanford University, the survey reported high levels of religious practice, Jewish lifestyle engagement, and Israel attachment.” This is a study conducted by a respected researcher on a specific movement. This is not PR for the organization, rather an indicator of what sort of Jewish young engagement is predictive of adult engagement.

  4. Julie – I really don’t think it’s unfounded to point out that the survey is a bad use of polling. Of course those 18% that respond are going to be the most supportive – It’s like asking Astro season ticket holders about their loyalty to the Astros and what impact going to Astro games has had on their lives. We should not then extrapolate that the views of season ticket holders are the same for all those that bough tickets to see an Astro game. Try and not get distracted by words like “professor” and long titles – ask yourself who is paying for this, why, and are the results truly reflective of the total population of the specific movement.

  5. Yehuda, please excuse the auto fil goofs. Please go to the Young Judaea website, alumni page, to the study in full. You will find a page that actually compares some of the findings to the Pew Study and the YJ numbers are still astounding.

  6. While there may be opportunity for the experienced researcher to find generalizations in this study, the casual reader can also find substantial support for Jewish camping, Jewish youth activities, and Jewish youth engagement with Israel from this study. To use Clint’s analogy, there is ample reason to support and promote more Astros season ticket holders!