• Home
  • About
    • About
    • Policies
  • Submissions
    • Op-eds
    • News / Announcements
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

eJewish Philanthropy

Your Jewish Philanthropy Resource

  • News Bits
  • Jewish Education
  • Readers Forum
  • Research
  • Show Search
Hide Search
You are here: Home / The Blog / The Next Big Thing, or the Next Near Thing?

The Next Big Thing, or the Next Near Thing?

February 17, 2016 By eJP

Let’s declare a moratorium on new Big Ideas and look at the possible Near Ideas that abound in our community.

genius is 1%By Andrés Spokoiny

If I had a penny for every time someone talked to me about creating “the next Birthright” or “the next PJ library,” I’d be a millionaire.

While these aspiring innovators are well-intentioned, what many are really saying is, “I want to be the inventor, the genius that comes up with the next great idea.” At the base of this desire lies not only hubris, but also a radical misconception about how creativity works.

From childhood we are told the tale of the great, lonely inventor: Newton discovered gravity when he saw the apple falling from the tree; Archimedes exclaimed, “Eureka!” in the bathtub and invented a method for measuring volume; Edison’s had a “light bulb moment” and invented the incandescent bulb.

But while these stories work well for children, they entrench a false idea of how innovation truly works. When Edison “invented” the light bulb, he relied on 80 years of prior tinkering with electricity and incandescent filaments. When Archimedes plunged into his bathtub, he was leaning on two centuries of Greek scientific development. Nobody, except perhaps God, can create something out of nothing. “Invention” actually shares its etymological root with the word “inventory” because, in fact, we invent based on what we have. Innovation happens mainly through a slow process of combining and recombining previously existing ideas.

That doesn’t diminish from the genius of a Newton, an Edison, or a Da Vinci, but it reframes it. What those inventors did was to discover “the adjacent possible.”

The concept of “the adjacent possible” was developed by biology theorist Stuart Kaufman to explain how evolution operates. The concept was then adapted and popularized by innovation theorist Steven B. Johnson. Their insight is that innovation doesn’t happen “ex-nihilo” but rather emerges within a context that was prepared by previous evolutions. The “adjacent possible” concept captures both the limits and the creative potential of innovation. Imagine a chess board: there are countless possible combinations of moves, but all of them exist within the confines of the board and the rules of the game. The adjacent possible, in Johnson’s words “is a kind of shadow future, hovering on the edges of the present state of things, a map of all the ways in which the present can reinvent itself.”

The adjacent possible is a much more appropriate tool than the great, lonely inventor for understanding how breakthrough innovations happen in the Jewish community, and a better conceptual framework for those trying to come up with the next Big Idea.

Both Birthright and PJ Library – two programs that have impacted an entire generation – were cases of discovering the adjacent possible.

In the case of Birthright, the revolutionary idea leaned on decades of experimentation with trips to Israel. Many of these had been funded and led by the future Birthright funders themselves, Charles Bronfman and Michael Steinhardt, and many had been undertaken by others (from The Jewish Agency to the universities). The genius of Charles and Michael was in discovering the adjacent possible by making the existing concept of the Israel experience into a near-universal experience for young Jews. Birthright is also an “adjacent possible” in terms of the participants’ behavior: young people were already in the habit of taking trips abroad during their formative years, and the brilliant adjacent move was to make Israel the destination.

The stroke of genius that led Harold Grinspoon to create PJ Library was sparked by Dolly Parton and her “Imagination Library” project. The “light bulb moment” was more connection than invention: what if we did this – a mass distribution of educational books – for Jewish children? The rest is history: 400,000 children are receiving Jewish-themed books through PJ library every month. As Charles and Michael had done with Birthright, Harold grabbed the coattails of on an existing habit. Parents already read stories to their children at bed time; Harold simply asked, “What if we made it very easy for parents to read Jewish stories to their children?”

Both programs also used partnership in an innovative way, a way which was itself an adjacent possibility. In other words, Birthright and PJ Library did not invent philanthropic partnership, but they created specific models that were both novel and functionally tailored to the changes they were seeking. The strange and beautiful truth about the adjacent possible is that its boundaries grow as you explore it. Each new adjustment or combination opens up its own new possibilities. The adjacent possible never runs out; it’s always there waiting for us, just at the boundaries of our reach.
So here’s my suggestion: let’s declare a moratorium on new Big Ideas and look at the possible Near Ideas that abound in our community. Forget “the new Birthright;” let’s explore the new territory that Birthright has opened up.

Of course, that approach requires being less territorial, and taking cues from voices we may not be used to thinking of as sources for Jewish philanthropic inspiration (such as Dolly Parton).

Discovering adjacent possibilities demands that we learn, with an open mind, what different players in the community are doing; it requires openness to sharing information and resources, and a flexible approach to organizational structures and processes.

Above all, it demands that we break down intellectual echo-chambers and create cognitive diversity in our organizations, with lots of opportunities for marginal voices to speak and be heard—because, usually, it will take somebody on the margins of a system to discover the possibilities that lie precisely at those boundaries.

Funders need to encourage this attitude both in the organizations they fund and among themselves. We must leave behind the childish idea of a lone genius making a sudden discovery and remember what Edison himself admitted, in a rare moment of candor: innovation is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration.

Andrés Spokoiny is President & CEO of Jewish Funders Network.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Filed Under: The Blog Tagged With: PJ Library, Taglit-Birthright Israel / Birthright Israel Foundation

Click here to Email This Post Email This Post to friends or colleagues!

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Corinne Black says

    February 17, 2016 at 1:59 pm

    Inspirational and so true.Possibilities beyond the next big idea give us a way to partner and collaborate with many incredible forward thinkers. Well done.

  2. Moshe Yaakov Krafchow says

    March 1, 2016 at 6:57 am

    Thanks! very true…. I studies the story of many achievers, who after many failed attempts finally got help.
    I grew up in Tsfat Israel, overlooking the Sea of Galilee where my favorite activity was gathering wild fruits from the mountainsides, including grapes, apples, plumbs, cactus fruit, mulberries, figs and many more. I noticed that this existence was a human legacy. I moved to the states in 1990 and couldn’t believe that there was no plenty of edibles in the woods!
    When I went to graduate school in Northern California, I found that the state of the woods is far worse than It appeared. Not only is it not providing plenty it is mostly dead and rotting and spawning great big fires. I started some research into what I can do; and I now have 10 years of perspiration behind me and great evidence of a method to turn our ready to burn woodlands of Southern California into a healthy woodlands that can provide from the grace of god.
    My method was inspired by two major concepts. 1. Ki Adam Etz Hasade. 2. the passage from Pirkei Avot that discusses the two types of trees, one with shallow roots and a great canopy that will fall with the first strong wind and the other with deep roots and a small canopy that all the storm in the world won’t bring it down and even in years of drought its fruit wont go dry.
    What we need to do here and now is basic Derech Eretz, and there is plenty of profit opportunity. After Derech Eretz can come Torah….. and I yearn to get there. for more info: TreeCultureSanDiego.com
    Please help me get the sheep back into the ‘Sadeh’; not a bare grassland but one full of Etz Hasadeh.

Primary Sidebar

Join The Conversation

What's the best way to follow important issues affecting the Jewish philanthropic world? Our Daily Update keeps you on top of the latest news, trends and opinions shaping the landscape, providing an invaluable source for inspiration and learning.
Sign Up Now
For Email Marketing you can trust.

Continue The Conversation

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Recent Comments

  • Steven Windmueller on Where Do We Go From Here?
    Dimensions To Planning for the Jewish Future
  • Jeremy J. Fingerman on Changing the Paradigm of Summer Camp in Israel
  • Susanne Landau on Millennial Connection, Redefined by a Southern Jewish Community
  • Esther Suissa on Changing the Paradigm of Summer Camp in Israel
  • Jordan Goodman on Where Do We Go From Here?
    Dimensions To Planning for the Jewish Future

Most Popular Recent Posts

  • BBYO receives historic $25 million Pledge to Support Women’s Leadership and Empowerment
  • Words to Avoid – 2019 Edition
  • Being Heard: What We Owe Jewish Community Professionals
  • Redefining Jewish Education: Federations’ Goals for a New Century
  • Caregiving – The Big Issue No One is Talking About

Categories

Archives

Footer

What We Do

eJewish Philanthropy highlights news, resources and thought pieces on issues facing our Jewish philanthropic world in order to create dialogue and advance the conversation. Learn more.

Top 40 Philanthropy Blogs and Websites to Follow in 2019

Copyright © 2019 · eJewish Philanthropy · All Rights Reserved