• Home
  • About
    • About
    • Policies
  • Submissions
    • Op-eds
    • News / Announcements
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

eJewish Philanthropy

Your Jewish Philanthropy Resource

  • News Bits
  • Jewish Education
  • Readers Forum
  • Research
  • Show Search
Hide Search
You are here: Home / The American Jewish Scene / The Conversations We Need to Be Having

The Conversations We Need to Be Having

March 2, 2018 By eJP

By Gil Preuss

This is conference season in the Jewish community. Many organizations will be holding major events and meetings, and important business will get done. I’ve attended hundreds of these gatherings and learned a great deal from them, but I can’t shake the sense that when we meet, we don’t really talk about what is truly important.

I wonder about the discussions we’re not having – whether on the panels, in the plenaries or in the hallways.

No, I’m not talking about the latest and the most urgent issues we face, whether in Jewish identity, diaspora-Israel relations, #metoo, the strength of our institutions or something else.

It’s not the content that’s missing.

It’s the conversation itself.

The problem, as I see it, is we are too quick to shut off and dismiss those with whom we disagree. We literally won’t listen to people who hold views that are different from our own, no matter the issue. I don’t think the Jewish community is alone in having this problem – but it’s getting in the way of our critical work.

As a community, we’re good at getting together. We’re good at responding to crises. We’re not good at listening to each other. None of us is innocent here. I know that there are times when I will steer clear of someone who I know just wants a debate. It’s natural – we prefer not to be browbeaten.

But all too often, we let that reluctance take over, and we stick to the same discussions with the same people – those who agree with us. Since we know that we are not going to change the other person’s views, we simply avoid a conversation or argument.

In today’s world, this issue is exacerbated by the way we control the information we get – we set up our own newsfeeds from sources we agree with, we participate in the echo chamber of our Facebook friends’ posts, and we are selective of the tweets we favorite and share. We wind up reading and seeing things that validate our beliefs.

I wonder what would happen if we took the time at conferences, meetings and other communal gatherings to have conversations with people on topics where there is no agreement and no hope of reaching one. What if we created an expectation that you can have opposing points of views, and still listen? What if people knew that they wouldn’t be shunned for saying something unpopular?

We would certainly gain a better appreciation of the diversity of thought and we would definitely strengthen the fabric of our community. In a recent article by Andrés Spokoiny, President & CEO of the Jewish Funders Network, he reflected, “Jews have always believed that the word of God is to be found amid the clatter and noise of debate. The secret of our creativity and our very survival is to be the… the people that is not afraid of differences; that embraces diversity as the ultimate source of richness; that believes that no human can have the total truth and that we need one another like pieces of a magnificent puzzle.”

Our heritage gives us many great examples of arguments that were spirited and unresolved but where the community grew through the process. Rabbi Andrea London reflects that the Jewish sport of argument is accompanied, in Talmudic lore, by the principle that we should respect each other. The houses of “Hillel and Shammai were willing to have their children ‘intermarry’ despite intense disagreement on matters of ethics and halachah (Jewish law),” she writes. “They were able to stay focused on a higher purpose: helping the Jewish people to live according to God’s will.”

Bringing this concept to life in our modern world isn’t always easy, but it is a higher purpose to which we must still aspire. Our community is built on multiple, varied and strong voices. By opening ourselves to hearing – and actually listening to – each unique perspective, we deepen our understanding of what makes us who we are.

To do this, we have to start from a position where the goal of the conversation isn’t to convince, but rather to listen and understand. We must assume that people come to every issue with different experiences – and those shape everything about them – including the positions they hold.

We also need to lower the volume. Our goal can’t be to shout louder or develop a more cutting argument or personal attack. Our goal has to be learn and engage.

This does not mean that we need to change our own views. Nor does it mean we should engage in discussion with a bigot or someone whose sole purpose is to incite a reaction.

It does mean that we give credit to people for having good intentions, even when they reach conclusions opposite our own. It means we have to assume that we might be wrong – or at the very least, we might not be the only holders of ‘truth.’ The goal isn’t to win an argument by shutting someone up; the goal is to learn by not shutting someone out. So how do we put this insight into action?

At Federation, we are delving into a strategic planning process by organizing a series of conversations about our priorities, hopes and dreams. In embarking on this work, we know that we must commit to ensuring that the multitude of voices who make up our community are all invited to the table – and that they feel welcome and heard when they get there. Beyond the strategic plan, we must commit to learning perspectives not typically heard. We must be open to ideas that challenge our own views of the world and community.

Individually, next time you’re at a meeting or conference, commit to taking the time to attend sessions where you’ll learn something new, where you know there will be attendees with different ideas, and you might come away with a broader perspective than before. Follow up directly with people who hold different, yet interesting perspectives. Connect with others who are equally as passionate about your issues but see them through a different lens.

We may find that whatever disagreements we have, we agree on bigger, more important things. There is no way to find out unless we show people that we want to get to know them despite our differences of opinion – and that we’re not defined by those differences.

The country is currently facing significant and increasing challenges because people are unable or unwilling to see “the other.” Our community is struggling with this, too. But that shouldn’t be. We share a history, faith, traditions, culture and countless experiences of struggle and celebration. Let’s not forget what unites us – the many ways in which our puzzle fits together – and listen and learn about the things where we might not agree. I believe we’ll be stronger for it – and renewed by the process.

Gil Preuss is the Chief Executive Officer of The Jewish Federation of Greater Washington.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: The American Jewish Scene, The Blog

Click here to Email This Post Email This Post to friends or colleagues!

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Susan Berger says

    March 2, 2018 at 1:13 pm

    Well said. This reality has saddened me endlessly these past couple of years (though I’ve seen it increasingly over time. For me, one of the most frustrating aspects is being accused of something I’m not or don’t think simply because I’ve raised a point another “side” (gosh, do I despise that concept) has. I make serious efforts to be intellectually honest–to have a discussion that can lead to mutual understanding and moving on but many times I’m not met with the same attitude or intentions. I fear this won’t and cannot change. What have we all become?

  2. Billy Planer says

    March 2, 2018 at 2:48 pm

    I couldn’t agree with you more. I have an ELI talk about this very need to talk with people you disagree. https://youtu.be/kavJoSufq8o
    The summer program I run for teens, Etgar 36 (www.etgar.org), has the participants listen to, discuss and debate with all sides of political issues in order to develop your own opinion but also to engage in civil discourse.

  3. Stew Bromberg says

    March 2, 2018 at 4:22 pm

    This is how I have always interpreted my Jewish heritage. I often felt that I might be overlooked for advancement in the Jewish communal non profit organizations I have been working for and using my passions for the community to improve the values I was raised on. We need to respect other opinions and support people’s rights to share them, share our values without imposing them on others and reach out and build community. Thank you for sharing your vision.

  4. Jordan Goodman says

    March 2, 2018 at 5:00 pm

    Shalom Dr. Gil,

    Gut g’zogt. As Dr. John Maxwell, leadership and management maven has said,
    “We should listen to understand rather than listen to respond.”

    Shabbat Shalom/Shavu’a tov to all of us,
    Biv’racha,
    Jordan

  5. Perry Newman says

    March 2, 2018 at 6:12 pm

    Well put. If I may, I’d say in addition that we are not only reasonably good at getting together, we are good at starting conversations. However, we have a great deal of difficulty sustaining the difficult conversations, and this is so for a variety of reasons, some having to do with the energy required to be in conflict, even controlled conflict, mode over a period of time. It also needs to be said that initiatives seeking to bring people of diverse, even controversial views together frequently lack donor support, thus organizations and communities retreat into the familiar or the path of least resistance. We choose our battles, so to speak. I’m hopeful that our communities can not only begin the process of engagement over difficult issues, but that we can sustain the effort required truly to make progress.

  6. Rise Roth says

    March 2, 2018 at 6:15 pm

    Thank you for writing this and sharing. I just began a Mussar class and we studied truth. Sometimes we are so committed to our own truth it becomes to impossible, scary even, to really listen to someone else’s truth.
    Shabbat Shalom

  7. Martin Levine says

    March 2, 2018 at 6:37 pm

    The effectiveness of the conversation depends on who is allowed into the room. Are all opinions welcome? Do we follow JFNA’s recent guidance to stay silent on gun policy and keep gun control advocates out of the room? What about those who support BDS or a one state solution? What about those who support Black Lives Matter? Or those who wish to see the wealthy taxed significnatly more than they are today? What about those who beleive that our community organizations need to be more radically restructured? And are they invited not just into the safe harbor of planning meetings but into the room where policy is set? When that happens we will be doing more than just talking about what a real conversation is about.

  8. Dave Neil says

    March 3, 2018 at 11:30 pm

    Gil,
    I couldn’t agree with you more. People are not listening to those who share different views.

    Someone pointed out to me that he thinks it has gotten worse with the internet. People who are conservative go for their news to conservative websites, people who are liberal go to their liberal news websites. Everyone is getting more entrenched by having their own view reinforced to the point that they don’t have patience to hear other points of view that are not in harmony with their own.

    One of the reasons Talmud study is cool is that on any given topic the narrative tries to look at the subject from a number of different perspectives- this is a good practice for everyone.

    Perhaps we should go back to our roots a bit and try a little Talmud study, or at the very least, try to discipline ourselves to listen to other points of views than our own with an open mind, even without Talmud study. Just a thought..

  9. Yaela says

    March 4, 2018 at 2:23 am

    Or perhaps, you know, we should try to get those who only study Talmud to widen their horizons a little and have an open mind? Also just a thought.

Primary Sidebar

Join The Conversation

What's the best way to follow important issues affecting the Jewish philanthropic world? Our Daily Update keeps you on top of the latest news, trends and opinions shaping the landscape, providing an invaluable source for inspiration and learning.
Sign Up Now
For Email Marketing you can trust.

Continue The Conversation

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Recent Comments

  • Bruce Powell on An Invitation To Transparency: Reflections on an Open Salary Spreadsheet
  • Sara Rigler on Announcement: Catherine Reed named CEO of American Friends of Magen David Adom
  • Donna Burkat on The Blessings in 2020’s Losses
  • swindmueller on Where Do We Go From Here?
    Reflections On 2021
    A Jewish Response to These Uncertain Times
  • Alan Henkin on Where Do We Go From Here?
    Reflections On 2021
    A Jewish Response to These Uncertain Times

Most Read Recent Posts

  • What Title for Henrietta Szold?
  • Jewish Agency Accuses Evangelical Contractors of “Numerous Violations” but Denies They Evangelized New Immigrants
  • An Invitation To Transparency: Reflections on an Open Salary Spreadsheet
  • Why One Zoom Class Has Generated a Following
  • The Blessings in 2020’s Losses

Categories

The Way Back Machine

Footer

What We Do

eJewish Philanthropy highlights news, resources and thought pieces on issues facing our Jewish philanthropic world in order to create dialogue and advance the conversation. Learn more.

Top 40 Philanthropy Blogs, Websites & Influencers in 2020

Copyright © 2021 · eJewish Philanthropy · All Rights Reserved