For “findings [that] are intended as illustrative, not definitive,” one writes an op-ed piece, not a report on a quantitative study.
And it would have taken only a short conversation with almost any North American Conservative rabbi to learn that, for others if not for him/herself, there is “a discrepancy between the official party line and how some rabbis see things.”
The study’s method was tendentious and the reporting of its findings was, as the author admits, no less tendentious.
For “findings [that] are intended as illustrative, not definitive,” one writes an op-ed piece, not a report on a quantitative study.
And it would have taken only a short conversation with almost any North American Conservative rabbi to learn that, for others if not for him/herself, there is “a discrepancy between the official party line and how some rabbis see things.”
The study’s method was tendentious and the reporting of its findings was, as the author admits, no less tendentious.