This week marks the 200th anniversary of a foundational event in Reform Judaism, the dedication of a Temple in Seesen, Germany. With the aim of reconciling Jewish tradition with modernity, it embraced a different aesthetic and modeled a new practice for Jewish worship. Today’s non-Orthodox synagogues face a different challenge – not to adapt their ideology to the present day, but rather to transform their institutions.
The Jews of twentieth-century America celebrated their achievements partly by erecting magnificent buildings that conveyed the solidity and success of the communities they served. The staff and operations of the synagogues, which often became correspondingly large, were supported mostly by member dues. Although synagogue attendance may not have been frequent, members paid their dues out of a sense of obligation and as a badge of affiliation with their local Jewish community.
That desire for affiliation and the feeling of obligation have weakened in the last couple of generations. Of course there are still many vital synagogues where the participants enjoy their experiences, feel a strong connection to the community, and are proud to be members. Generally, however, choice is now valued more highly than obligation. Jews shop for the best synagogue value based on the needs of their families, and those needs are often very specific.
It’s not that American Jews are necessarily less interested in the religious aspects of Jewish life, or that they feel less obligated to live ethical lives. The difference is that they now have more choices for spiritual pursuits, for engaging in action to make the world a better place, or simply for being with other Jews. Where young Jews a generation ago might have responded to the Prophets’ call for justice through charitable contributions or local volunteering, they now might work with refugees in Africa or help with disaster relief in Haiti. They may support environmentalism by biking with Hazon. It is hard for synagogues to make the case that member dues are as compelling as that kind of personal commitment, or that hearing sermons about social justice is as powerful as taking action.
Nonetheless, many synagogues assume that what they offer is a necessary part of the Jewish experience and see the challenge as finding the revenue to support it. They may add activities to seem more relevant but they keep the basic structure. That business model, however, is out of step with a membership that is primarily interested in lifecycle events, High Holiday services, and occasional pastoral services. It also doesn’t respond to the many competing opportunities for Jewish engagement.
Each synagogue needs to map its own destination, and there are no shortcuts to getting there. But there are some general directions to avoid getting lost.
- Don’t blame the congregants. It’s not their fault that the synagogue isn’t responsive to their needs. They’re not being selfish or irresponsible because they don’t become members. Look instead at how to give them a synagogue experience worth supporting.
- Imitate success. The most successful religious organizations in America are the ones operated by Chabad and by evangelical Christians. What they have in common is one-on-one outreach that leads to committed community members. Instead of scorning these movements, learn from their experience and offer what evangelicals call “fellowship” – not a vague “warm and welcoming” feeling, but a tightly embracing community of specific shared values.
- Make choices. One of the cardinal rules of marketing is that you can’t be all things to all people. Yet synagogues try, often because they mistakenly confuse “inclusiveness” with not taking a position. Chabad is aggressively inclusive, but it is very clear about what it is and what it is not. Religious institutions, like other kinds, inspire involvement to the extent that they stand for something.
- Say little and do much. When a congregant calls the rabbi’s office to request an appointment and is told that the first available date is two months away, something is badly wrong – and the synagogue’s Vision Statement won’t compensate for the congregant’s resulting unhappiness. Don’t pass new resolutions. Just make sure that the synagogue responds quickly, routinely, and successfully to its members’ individual urgencies.
Synagogues, like other service organizations, ultimately can’t last unless they fill a particular need and keep their costs in line with revenue. They can start by doing a better job of anticipating and recognizing young Jews’ religious interests, redesigning the organization to respond to those interests imaginatively and effectively, and questioning all the rest. The transition won’t be easy, but the alternative is obsolescence.
Bob Goldfarb, a long-time consultant and a Harvard MBA, is president of the Center for Jewish Culture and Creativity in Los Angeles and Jerusalem. His Twitter feed about Jews, the arts, and Jewish culture is at Twitter.com/bobgoldfarb.







This is a very thoughtful piece and should be used by congregational leadership to engage meaningful conversation and actions around the underlining issues discussed.
One of the biggest challenges synagogue leadership has today is understanding what business is slowly learning – the world has turned upside down as it pertains to who owns the brand. And in this case the brand is Judaism. Up until 2000, synagogues and business/brands in general were still “owners” of the brand and creating the rules for the game.
Technology has completely shifted that. Today the customer, or in the synagogues case the member/prospective member owns the Judaism brand, and the organized Jewish world’s responsibility is to listen, engage and influence where members and potential members are.
Ejewish Philanthropy is an example of the kind of shift that is happening today. Juxtaposed to the discussions happening in the Knesset, about who is a Jew. Clearly the Israeli government does not get it.
Organizations that can be involved in this new world of networked community will be the organizations that we will participate in.
Ayeka is doing precisely what Ben is referring to – offering synagogues new tools of engagement that are extremely personal and spiritual. Intimate small groups settings are a primary way to affect people’s lives and consequently their institutions. It breaks the “largeness and impersonality” often endemic to synagogue life.
What Chabad and Evangelical Christians in fact have in common is a commitment to an unwavering set of guiding principles that govern the way they live their lives, and a commitment to participation in insular, exclusive communities of like-minded coreligionists. Liberal Judaism has a great many advantages, but an unwavering set of guiding principles is not among them–in casting off the constraints of Halakha, Reform Judaism allowed for unparalleled growth and creativity; it also made it incredibly difficult for Rabbis to “take a position” and know “what [Reform Judaism] is and what it is not.”
I agree with Mr. Goldfarb that synagogues need to adopt a more flexible approach if they want to continue to attract and retain new members. The main area that I think synagogues need to expand and improve the level of services offered is in Jewish education opportunities, and I would suggest that they do so in ways that stretch beyond the traditional introductory level classes which are important in terms of providing some basic context when it comes to engaging with the Tanakh or Jewish rituals and life-cycle events. While there have been many successful efforts to keep the Jewish community vibrant and healthy outside the walls of the synagogue over the last decade, there are synagogues which are beginning to embrace some of the ideas that Mr. Goldfarb has suggested are worthy of emulation, and the results are promising.Personally, I would like to see synagogues offering more adult education programs which make use of the arts to explore Jewish life and culture, as well as opportunities to talk about the relationship Israel and the Diaspora.
Thanks to Bob for this well written blog post. One of Bob’s key assumptions needs to be challenged. Neither Chabad nor evangelical Christianity can be considered the most successful religious movements today. Large scale impersonal public visibility on Jewish streets or appearances in front of millions of viewers on evangelical cable television shows, does not often translate into positive improvements in individual lives. We need only look at Pastor Rick Warren’s Saddleback Church, once so purposeful, but now fallen into financial hard times.
Synagogues may do best as smaller institutions that work with a limited number of Jews to improve Jewish lives. We should see our synagogues as “private spaces,” and extensions of the homes of the select people who choose to join the congregation. As a private space, each synagogue can measure success by upgrading the lives of the Jews who discovered the synagogue and then elected to become members of the congregation.
Mark Goldstein
Great piece. I wonder how rabbinical schools will incorporate this into their rabbinic training?