• Home
  • About
    • About
    • Policies
  • Submissions
    • Op-eds
    • News / Announcements
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

eJewish Philanthropy

Your Jewish Philanthropy Resource

  • News Bits
  • Jewish Education
  • Readers Forum
  • Research
  • Show Search
Hide Search
You are here: Home / Inside Israel / Jewish Continuity – Israel’s Responsibility

Jewish Continuity – Israel’s Responsibility

August 13, 2015 By eJP

By Yossi Beilin

“Haaretz”, the newspaper which usually expresses opinions near and dear to my heart, angered me with its scathing rebuke of the government’s plan to strengthen ties with the Diaspora. I can understand critique from a content perspective, but under no circumstances on the effort to maintain it.

In an editorial published this past Monday, the paper states “Any program dealing with the dangers of “assimilation” (the article had it in quotes) … the government has no right to preach to overseas Jews about what kind of family units they should establish. This presumption reflects a harmful arrogance and even emits a racist stench.”

If the government is indeed ready to budget 190 million shekel for Jewish continuity around the world (on top of the funding for “Taglit” and “Masa”), it is an important tiding which points to a change in direction: instead of counting on generous donations from Jews in the America and other countries around the world, it is Israel opening it’s pockets, bringing young Jews to visit Israel and contributing in their Jewish education. Israel is looking to cut back on the scope of assimilation, which it does not see in “quotes,” but a disturbing trend which is commonplace in the Diaspora, that no liberal is allowed to prevent, but that it is certainly entitled to create conditions under which is can be curbed.

Israel, as I see it, is the homeland for the Jewish people and all its citizens. Unlike other countries, it has a specific purpose which was accentuated by the decimation of European Jews during the Holocaust – to facilitate the continuity of the Jewish people as much as possible. It cannot enforce this continuity upon anyone in the world, it cannot and is not allowed to prevent intermarriage, it cannot force a specific educational curriculum upon anyone who does not want it or support any government policy at any specific time. All that Israel can and must do is offer the Jewish world an option.

The option is to give young Jews from around the world the chance to identify with the Jewish narrative, to feel part of an extended family which gives them an identity in our detached world and give them the opportunity to meet other young Jews and form Jewish families. Israel’s role is that in an intermarriage, the non-Jewish partner will not feel left out (which is very common) and that they too could be part of the Jewish people – if they want – without having to go through a ritual conversion.

The Jewish Agency’s objections to collaborate with the Government’s plan reminds me of their fight against the “Taglit” program when I first presented it in 1994: it’s not a matter of principle, it is a bureaucratic struggle from an organization whose budget continues to shrink, which lost its relevancy 67 years ago yet insists to carry on as if there is no State which is not allowed set aside budgets for Jewish issues. I would suggest “Haaretz” not join in this bureaucratic struggle.

Yossi Beilin served as a minister in Rabin’s, Peres’ and Barak’s governments and other executive and parliamentary roles. In the 1990’s he initiated Taglit – the Birthright Israel program.

This article was originally published in Israel Hayom (Hebrew edition) on August 11, 2015. Translated and published with permission.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Filed Under: Inside Israel, Readers Forum Tagged With: The Jewish Agency/JAFI

Click here to Email This Post Email This Post to friends or colleagues!

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Steve - NYC says

    August 13, 2015 at 3:52 pm

    This is not a true outreach to Diaspora communities — it is the government subsidizing one of its own to spread extreme right-wing propaganda. Judging by the state of Judaism within Israel with the Ultra-Orthodox running rampant and denying the legitimacy of any Jew who does not recognize their rabbis as popes, they are in no position to strengthen Jewish values abroad.

  2. Ted Sokolsky says

    August 13, 2015 at 4:27 pm

    Wow! Has Yossi Beilin got this wrong! His obvious dislike and resentment for the Jewish Agency going back to the founding of Taglit has blinded him to the extent that he doesn’t see how Bayit Hayehudi has destroyed exactly the kind of Diaspora-Israel collaborative relationship role for which Yossi has always valiantly fought.

    The original Prime Minister’s initiative to build that coalition would have been a bold step forward in the right direction. This recent reincarnation, however, is a giant step backwards in Diaspora-Israel relationships that returns to old paternalist stereotypes. These out-of-date views maybe useful for domestic political consumption but will only serve to further alienate young Diaspora Jews.

    The changes are everything everyone feared when the plan was first initiated–just another example of internal Israeli political maneuvering that throws genuine dialogue with the Diaspora under the bus again.

  3. Jake Silverstein says

    August 13, 2015 at 8:38 pm

    I want to thank Mr. Beilin for this insightful piece.

    I’m not exactly sure where Ted comes off saying that the initiative is a return to the old paternal stereotypes. Is Beilin lying when he says that the Israeli government is actually going to budget 190 millions shekels? Isn’t it better for Israel to pay it’s share in these programs? Considering the financial state of some of them, it would be a welcome injection of funds.

    Also, how can Steve say that it’s right wing propaganda when no one has actually discussed one program?

    Sounds like knee jerk reactions to me.

  4. Son Pennisi says

    September 2, 2015 at 12:28 am

    Zionism, the national liberation movement of the Jewish people, brought about the establishment of the State of Israel, and views a Jewish, Zionist, democratic and secure State of Israel to be the expression of the common responsibility of the Jewish people for its continuity and future. Aliyah to Israel from all countries and the effective integration of all immigrants into Israeli Society.

Primary Sidebar

Join The Conversation

What's the best way to follow important issues affecting the Jewish philanthropic world? Our Daily Update keeps you on top of the latest news, trends and opinions shaping the landscape, providing an invaluable source for inspiration and learning.
Sign Up Now
For Email Marketing you can trust.

Continue The Conversation

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Recent Comments

  • Judy Aron on I Mansplained a Woman Rabbi and I Liked It
  • Avi Rubel on Honeymoon Israel is not an “Interfaith Couples” Trip to Israel
  • Andrea Wasserman on Human Capital in the Age of Amazement:
    Reflections on Ted2018
  • David on Birthright Israel and #MeToo
  • Jordan Goodman on Reinventing the Jewish Public Square: Promoting a Jewish Community Relations Model for the 21st Century

Categories

Archives

Footer

What We Do

eJewish Philanthropy highlights news, resources and thought pieces on issues facing our Jewish philanthropic world in order to create dialogue and advance the conversation. Learn more.

Top 40 Philanthropy Blogs and Websites to Follow in 2018

Copyright © 2018 · eJewish Philanthropy · All Rights Reserved