Comments on: Five Answers to Seth Cohen’s “Tomorrow and Tomorrow and Tomorrow” http://ejewishphilanthropy.com/five-answers-to-seth-cohen%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%9ctomorrow-and-tomorrow-and-tomorrow%e2%80%9d/ Connect. Educate. Innovate. Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:13:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Barak Moore http://ejewishphilanthropy.com/five-answers-to-seth-cohen%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%9ctomorrow-and-tomorrow-and-tomorrow%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-31610 Barak Moore Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:23:18 +0000 http://ejewishphilanthropy.com/?p=2328#comment-31610 The argument that innovation by small organizations condemns large ones to obsolescence is one of the most innovative excuses I've ever heard. In business, as well, entrepreneurial companies tend to be small. The difference is that their innovative success propels them to become big in a free marketplace. Interestingly, the competitive marketplace in religion has led to a survival of the most innovative, even among the most traditional (e.g. Chabad, Aish Hatorah, Carlebach, Merkaz Harav and Artscroll). The Jewish communal world would do well to take Seth Cohen's suggestion in reverse. Let the money follow the innovation, not the politics. Barak Moore Moore Innovation The argument that innovation by small organizations condemns large ones to obsolescence is one of the most innovative excuses I’ve ever heard.

In business, as well, entrepreneurial companies tend to be small. The difference is that their innovative success propels them to become big in a free marketplace.

Interestingly, the competitive marketplace in religion has led to a survival of the most innovative, even among the most traditional (e.g. Chabad, Aish Hatorah, Carlebach, Merkaz Harav and Artscroll).

The Jewish communal world would do well to take Seth Cohen’s suggestion in reverse. Let the money follow the innovation, not the politics.

Barak Moore
Moore Innovation

]]>